Archive for August 28, 2011

Why I Love Panda: Part One

Such a big post I thought it’s best to split it up into two – so check out Why I Love Panda: Part Two just here. If you haven’t checked out Pandalized.com yet, then take a look. Even if you’re not strictly an SEO it’s a great data set showing the big hits taken to content farms in the wake of Google’s Panda Algorithm updates. I find eHow.com’s graph particularly interesting. Three seemingly mega hits in succession, reducing it to pre-2010 levels.

eHow.com

Seeing this data, you can only really say that Google’s approach has been nothing short of brutal. Across the board falls come rapidly and almost instantly from updates. There’s clearly not been much of a warning. Some of these ‘businesses’ must be getting seriously worried about their future. But do I feel sorry for them? No I don’t. There are plenty of reasons why – so many and I had to pour out so much that I’ve had to split this over two posts! Here we go with the first three reasons of why I love Panda.

Gaming Algorithms and Reducing Content Cost

Demand Media have profited for quite some time by building a system that basically worked out many uncompetitive long tail search terms, and created content for a vast variety of long tail searches. Having a long tail strategy is fine, but I feel doing it on this scale devalues online content; particularly when an amateur is getting paid the pittance that Demand award. Consequently, journalism as an online paid profession is now at serious risk.

Check out TechCrunch’s recent article – Now Can We All Agree That The “High Quality Web Content Experiment Has Failed? The economics of professional online journalism in comparison to how print operates largely doesn’t work. Content is not sold, thus there is a huge chunk of revenue removed from the model. The only viable option for online journalism is currently where it’s used to sell products (ASOS.com, web editors of the world salute you).

Demand Media style models squeeze the possible profit margins on online content. Content farms inevitably drove the value of properly researched professional content down. I agree wholeheartedly that you can get very useful insight from a site like HubPages, but more often than not you have to go through quite a lot of tosh. I’m wondering, for instance, why any writer would like to become a daddy on HubPages rather than on their own publishing platform, unless they had the ulterior motive of self-promotion. I would assume the majority of people writing on this site are doing so to promote their own agendas and sites rather than for love of their topic. Hey, I’ll even admit it – I deliberately achieved a 75+ Hub score to link back to some sites and have the rel=”nofollow” removed. The content was ‘quality’ enough for this to happen.

Panda slams the models that game search engines – it celebrates authoratitive authorship built up over time.

Link Building via Content & Further Devaluation

I’ve previously worked for an SEO agency for more than a year where I was a ‘copywriter’, but the only real point in my copy being published was so that links to clients could be inserted into it. I certainly learned a lot about airport parking, credit cards and car insurance, but the knowledge that my writing was created to be linked and not seen was soul destroying. Writing that is used to game search engines and content as a commodity needs to go. Content should be used to build audience and engagement, not fill up the web with keyword heavy titled documents that answer huge amounts of search queries, linking to a client who may not deserve those links.

Panda sees content not as a commodity, but as something written by a human being.

Affiliate Problems

That SEO is affiliated with spam is nothing new. Indeed it’s often affiliates who are responsible for SEO spam. Affiliates – those people who don’t have any of their own products to sell. I’ve got no problem with affiliates; I am one myself on an extremely small scale. But it’s curious that you can expect to sell a product indirectly and rank you higher than your partner who does sell it directly. It’s their system, their business, which you’ll be using. They’re the ones who have taken the risk in setting up the system and invested in it. I’m weirded out by affiliates that rank higher than the original product. Yes, marketing is far more than just selling products; it’s about how you sell them, but people who create original products deserve to rank higher than those that piggyback them. Make something original, rank higher – that logic should mix with product as well as content. If you create a system that allows better comparison of products, then certainly you should be allowed to rank high as an affiliate, but someone who is taking a product and repackaging needs to be wiser.

Panda should help smack affiliates, and get the original stuff closer to the top.

Check out – Why I Love Panda: Part Two

Socially Charging Your Content: Creating Content for Facebook and Twitter

Most of what social media presents us isn’t particularly new. Rick Levine’s essay But How Does it Taste in The Cluetrain Manifesto provides a great quote on this:

“It’s … practical to think of social media as the use of the mundane, commonplace technology around us in the pursuit of a goal transcending that technology: fostering conversation and connection between people.”

The quote is one of the most profound in the book – the web and social media are simply tools to accelerate communication, particularly conversation. When I think about the integration of social media into content, then I don’t feel this is particularly new either. Certainly, ten years ago we wouldn’t be asking viewers to upload a video of themselves to YouTube to enter a contest – the technology wasn’t there – but almost all magazines have had a letters section since they were first printed. There has been an interacting connection between reader and writer, just social media has broadened the range of this and accelerated its execution.

What Size Following Do You Need?

On Facebook, you can collect content from an engaged fanbase incredibly quickly. I’ve previously noted in my post Social Media Drives all Traffic Sources, that a ‘Larger Social Media Profiles’ stage, where you can capture data and poll users meaningfully really starts at around 10,000 for media brands. However, that’s not strictly necessary to collect content from your users, and size really depends on vertical – if you’re an ecommerce provider of white household goods, for instance, you’d probably have a much lower quantity. And it also depends on what kind of questions you want to ask.

Creating Regular Features

With regard to creating content, then you can use Facebook and Twitter to ask questions of your fanbase. You could create a regular feature: ‘Facebook Fan Views’ and have the subject the trendiest topic in your vertical during a given week. Let’s think you operate as a seller of computer hardware. This week your post could be:

So this week Steve Jobs resigned from his role as Chief Executive of Apple. How do you think this will affect Apple’s next hardware releases?

Let us know in the comments – selected ones will be used in this week’s Facebook Fan Views.

You may get tripe from this, but you may get some really useful insight. Create an article, lead and open the debate but then express the best fan views for different schools of thought. Make sure that you allow user comments on the article too so you can take it further. People who contribute there may want to feature in the main article next week rather than down in the comments, so they’ll be waiting for you to make the next similar post. Make this a regular thing and you’ll quickly be able to see top contributors and highlight these people as advocates. Talk to them – use them for your own insight.

Facebook Questions

You can also collect data very fast through using the Facebook Question tool (the far right option of the status update). You can poll fans quickly on any topic – get their views and then use this data to create content. You could say, we polled our 2,000 strong Facebook fanbase and 800 of them let us know their view, then express the results (data visualisation skills desirable).

FHM Update

Form Building

The final thing you can do is collect more privately held views. Examples might be a medical practice that wants to find out stories of embarrassing illnesses. With this, a public poll or comment would be largely inappropriate. But since Facebook apps rely on iframes it’s incredibly easy to do – create some forms on your website that collect name, contact details and then a larger form for message input, then iframe it in via a tab application. Of course, you’ll need to drive people to the tab, so make sure you create posts on Facebook and Twitter that link directly to the tab – of course you could direct them direct to your website too. I just think it’s good to keep them within the network and build the engagement with your fans on the network itself.

Jillian Michaels on Facebook

Here’s a great example of the form builder in action on Jillian Michael’s Facebook page. Click on submit and then a modal window appears where you can input free text – great for finding out the personal fitness stories of her fans. The page is powered by Buddy Media, but you could build an ‘app’ on your site and iframe it in.

Facebook EdgeRank – A Simple Guide

I’m not that much of a fan of algorithms. While it can be satisfying fun to crunch the data associated with algorithms and find out something new, I never really find that data particularly actionable. It’s often small beer. My answer to: “We’ve found that site speed now accounts for 2% of the Google algorithm,” would often be, “Who cares? Build links rather than spend money on a developer – it’s still a more cost effective way to get up a search engine.” I’d prefer SEOs to take a more human touch when working. Although, that said, this post is about Facebook’s algorithm – EdgeRank. Basically, it’s the algorithm that works out what should appear at the top of ‘Top News’ (the default for desktop, not mobile) on www.facebook.com.

Sources:

Before we get going, I’d like to point out some sources. Buddy Media’s Guide – Facebook’s EdgeRank: How to Make Sure You’re in the Newsfeed (PDF) is probably the most actionable White Paper I’ve ever read. It doesn’t go into depth about what EdgeRank is, just how to rank. Next up – Kelvin Newman’s longish post on the subject of EdgeRank. There’s also a few more things to feast on at the bottom of my blog Facebook Like Does Count as a Ranking Factor (I Reckon)

The Algorithm

This can neatly be summed up in triangular fashion thus:

Facebook EdgeRank Algorithm

Now let’s get to grips with this. The Newsfeed Item called ‘Object’ is just the Status update. Now we have the exterior triangles to tackle:

  • Affinity: This is how close you are to that object. If you engage with it, it becomes more relevant. If your friend or another object (like a page) you are close to on the Open Graph interacts with it, then it becomes more relevant. If you haven’t interacted with anything associated with that object for a while, then you’re affinity will be weaker. For instance, I see very little information from ‘friends’ I never interact with.
  • Weight: I don’t think Kelvin got the definition of this right on his post. Rather than it being the ‘weight’ of the object, I believe as a ranking factor it is the weight of the engagement. Engagements are Comments, Likes and Shares. A Comment has the most weight, then a Like, then a Share. The premise is simple – the more Comments and Likes a post gets, the more Facebook will give it more Weight, deem it relevant to you, and shunt the Object up the newsfeed.
  • Time Decay: The older posts are, the less likely you are to see them at the top of the feed. The default for www.facebook.com is Top News – that means posts have got to be current. You’ll rarely see a post more than 24 hours in top spot unless you have very few connections.

What’s the Weighting of Each Element?

I don’t really know – I would presume they’re all pretty similar. Certainly you can optimise for Facebook posting by putting an emphasis on weight – so asking questions and being explicit in requesting fans Like the page – check out Facebook Posts Should Meet 5 of the Following 10. You can’t really be as tactical with Affinity and Time Decay just decays. If there’s one you can worry about – it’s Weight.

Facebook Posts Should Meet 5 of the Following 10

So this is the third time in as many weeks I’ve linked to Buddy Media’s White Paper Facebook’s EdgeRank: How to Make Sure You’re in the Newsfeed – maybe I should do some more research; I’ve done plenty – and I haven’t found much better than this. Basically this paper does a great job of providing an actionable checklist for editors of Facebook posts. The list is pretty simple:

  1. Ask questions
  2. Post games and trivia
  3. Interact with fan engagement
  4. Incorporate wall apps (such as the poll)
  5. Incorporate relevant photos
  6. Relate to current events
  7. Incorporate videos
  8. Post content for time sensitive campaigns
  9. Include links within posts
  10. Be explicit in your posts (tell fans what you want them to do).

So Buddy Media say posts that incorporate one or more of these suggestions generally do better on the newsfeed. You can do better than that – go for five… it’s possible. How many do you think this one got?

honey

This post asks a question, creates a game (you’ll probably have to visit the site to get the answer), it drives traffic to the website through the link, FHM has responded to users in the comments, it incorporates photo and it is explicit in that it asks fans to Like or comment (5 – yay) – the only thing it really misses is being related to current events, but it similar updates could incorporate this. For instance, if there was bad weather across the country, it could use an image of a girl in the rain.

Use this checklist and go for five or more in all posts, you’ll be top of the news feed in a flash! For more on Facebook EdgeRank, check out my post Facebook EdgeRank – A Simple Guide.

A #winning Guide to Transient Social Spurting

Do you ever login to analytics and see your traffic spurt up? You wonder what’s going on, look deeper to see that Twitter has given you 20,000 visits in a day when you normally get 10. It’s something I do more and more. It’s a ‘transient social spurt’…

What’s with the name?

Well, I can see why you might suggest it’s a little wacky and rude, but how else am I going to get your attention? This is analytics after all. Anyhow, at least it makes sense.

What’s a spurt then?

Spurting comes from massive profiles who Tweet or post your stuff. They’re pretty easy to find. In the SEO Twitter-clique a Tweet from Rand Fishkin or Michael Gray could give you a spurt – they’re going to give you a boost relative to your traffic size. But let’s think bigger, much bigger.

Who’s the biggest spurters?

Celebrities and media owned profiles are pretty much the Kings and Queens of social spurting. One Tweet can send literally thousands of fans/followers through a link.

How do I get a celebrity endorsement?

There’s a couple of methods here. The first thing you really need is an article that is relevant or pleases the celebrity in question. Take this post on Grazia all about Lily Allen’s new shop. Lily Allen liked the review and was glad it got onto Grazia Daily, so she Tweeted it and the site got a spurt.

But hold up – I’m not a big brand

Okay, okay – very few sites have the brand clout of Grazia – it’s one of the largest women’s magazines in the UK. But still, you could aim lower than Lily Allen – you could aim for a D-Lister, or go down to local celebrity. The key is a bit of hustle. Pick your battles wisely, write content that your spurter will be interested in, then @reply them. I did this recently on Twitter with @tomcritchlow on my hustle post. I’ve never spoken to him before, but I’ve heard him say hustle enough in his videos/tweets to know that he liked it. I’m a fledgling blogger and the mention had great benefits. I got a load of Tweets and followers. Thanks Tom!

What about Facebook?

Now Twitter’s great and everything, and it’s probably easier to get people to do stuff, but Facebook is where the real meat is. I mean, check out The Inbetweener’s page. There’s 3 million people on it (largely from the UK) – that’s some heavy stuff. So if you’re a fashion house, or you work in entertainment or something that could be related back to The Inbetweeners, all you need to do is know the person who controls updates to this page – write a relevant bit of content (say, Inbetweener’s star models for xxx clothing line) then hustle the admin into posting it. It’s a fairly throw away thing for them to do, but it’ll mean a ton of delicious traffic for you.

How do I find these people?

Fortunately, I’ve got a few contacts in the media world that can do this sort of thing. It’s often PR types who are behind Facebook page. Don’t have those contacts? Well get networking for real and get yourself onto a PR database like Gorkana (everyone’s a journalist now, and you can sign up for free). If you work in PR and know how to pull a few strings, then I’d like to talk to you.

What should I do?

Next bit of content you have, find a social spurter, do your research on them and then tailor it to their (you might even want to give them some credit in the process) – then hustle. If you get a social spurt, you’ll probably get loads of ReTweets, Facebook Likes and links too. #winning.

Social Media Drives All Traffic Sources

Most companies will wax lyrical about how much traffic social media is sending them. I heard in one presentation that ASOS was now receiving more traffic via Facebook than Google (which is almost certainly incorrect, since the Keyword Tool tells us the brand receives 3.5 million search a month on exact match!).

Social media definitely does send traffic via referrals – on one of our sites a Twitter profile drives 15% of all visits (most of them being repeat visits). That doesn’t get anywhere near to Google, but it’s bigger than Yahoo!, Facebook and Bing put together.

But enough of all this – social media really drives all forms of traffic, search included, and you can supercharge it to be a real driver in traffic building.

Behold – the World’s Crappest Infographic!

Okay, so I’m clearly no designer, but I had to get something vaguely understandable in front of senior executives, and I only had Microsoft Word 2003 to play with.

Check it out… Now here’s the process:

Phase #1 Profile Growth

We’ll leave out ‘setting up’ a social profile as a pre-stage as no one is daft enough not to have a social media profile for their brand – right? Growth from a profile takes a bit of resource and time – but you got to do it for the model to work. Basically, you can use the following:

    • Posting content and interacting with fans (that woolly word engagement)
    • Sweepstakes and competitions (run these with an app platform on Facebook – like Wildfire)
    • Targeted advertising (promoted Tweets, or Facebook Social Stories – these are cheap for fan/follower acquisition!)

Phase #2a Larger Social Media Profiles

So it really depends on your market and what you sell, but let’s take media for example. I believe the ‘Larger Social Media Profiles’ stage, where you can capture data and poll users meaningfully really starts at around 10,000 for media brands, although it could be much smaller if you have high engagement. Bottom line is, you achieve this Phase when you can collect meaningful data from your fanbase.

Phase #2b Data Capture and Polling

You can run contests and collect data via Facebook applications – then put all these conversions into your email database, so you have them on two accounts.

The use of polling then has further reaching consequences than insight alone. As well as increasing fan engagement, you can create data sets that editorial + designers can use to create content and design infographics – basically sharable linkable content.

Phase #3a Even Larger Social Media Profiles

You reach this stage when your profiles have become so large that they can be used a advertising tools. For instance, they would offer significant value to a brand if it was mentioned and recommended from the profile, because the reach is so large. I’m going to use an indicative figure, but I believe in media real value is only reached past 50,000 fans, and it would be preferable to be 80,000. Now then – the benefits of massive profiles are fourfold:

  • Data sets are much larger
  • Referral traffic to associated destination site would be higher
  • Direct traffic would likely increase, as people have more regular contact with the brand
  • Natural search (!) see below

Phase #3b – Natural Search

Because links posted on massive social media profiles will generate potentially thousands of clicks, posting links to third parties presents high value to the mentioned third party. Agreements can be worked whereby the third party agrees to put a permanent natural link on their website, in exchange for a social media ‘plug’ whereby a bit.ly to their content is merely posted to the fans. I’ve used this for great success – small guy gets a burst of traffic in exchange for a permanent link (which drives no traffic directly). Of course, indirectly, you’ll go shooting up a search engine.

Conclusive Benefits:

So we’ve listed a ton of benefits – but here they are in summary:

  • Massive social media profiles mean more people are connected to a brand’s messaging.
  • Data collection becomes cheaper and easier, no longer reliant on just editorial.
  • Journalist research times are cut because we own easily accessible data sets, the criteria of which are set by the journalists exact to their requirements.
  • The traffic growth potential benefits are also threefold:
    • Referral traffic from social media sites is larger.
    • You’ll be in a stronger position to form strong relationships with Third Party sites that will send referral traffic and build natural links to content, which would enhance SEO.
    • Direct traffic and branded search would also increase, as more users become engaged with the brands on social media.

So there you have it, social media drives all forms of traffic.

3 Tried and Tested Facebook Posting Case Studies

Facebook posting is the kind of job that’s often given to the noob who knows nothing about marketing. No Social Media Exec? Give it to the intern! With no tuition, they’ll probably start off with some counterproductive messaging about selling products:

Toilet Talks Facebook

“But Facebook posting is dead easy!” I hear you cry.

Wrong again friend – getting Facebook posting right is pretty tricky, but there are certainly methods to get you through it. I follow near 50 different brands on Facebook. Here are three of my favourite tried and tested methods.

Skittles – c.19.25 million Likes

Skittles Facebook Posting

Skittles online marketing mix is a celebration of the crazy. It is in danger of aligning itself somewhere along the lines of an LSD trip, yet it is incredibly successful. The Facebook posting is frankly genius. It is usually an incredibly creatively thought out post of randomness – as we see above, and Skittles is only mentioned enough for you to be subtly reminded about the brand. The purpose never seems to sell anything, and it is usually a statement rather than applying one of the ten advised criteria for Facebook posting. Just think of the job spec for whoever gets to post through that page. It must include:

Must communicate with 19.25 million people on a daily basis.

Which is frankly mind blowing. Updating the Skittles page is one of the biggest jobs in social media, and whoever is behind it is either a genius, or, more likely, they spend a lot of time considering their next Facebook post.

Playboy – c.5.3 million Likes

Playboy Facebook

I have never bought a copy of Playboy. Like a lot of men, I may have “read it” once when I was a teenager. I had no real interest in their brand. That was until I started working on FHM’s social media and subscribed to all the competitive men’s lifestyle publications. Playboy’s strategy is great for a number of reasons, but here’s a break down:

  • It regularly compliments the models and has links to like the specific cover girl’s fan page, in an effort to build her personal brand
  • It integrates articles built up from other social media channels – namely ‘Frisky Friday’ on Twitter, where aspiring models send in their sexiest pics.
  • It offers very low cost offers to its social media fans – $1 to join the Cyber Club! Hey, porn is generally free, but that’s near enough (and let’s be honest here, Playboy is a premium product). Low cost offering gets people involved in a billing cycle.
  • (Shown above) They include posts about casting calls and use publish backstage photography of the event to allow greater user access.
  • It compliments a wide range of partner sites, no doubt sending them considerable traffic from its 5 million strong fanbase

While Playboy is still a soft pornographic publication, all of this still accredits a well fostered community and it’s why Playboy is probably the leading men’s lifestyle title in the digital space.

Freebirds World Burritos – c.89k Likes

Smaller scale than the other two, but necessary to point out because of posting that sells without being overbearing. Posts inform users of new Freebirds openings, and where future plans to open are. They integrate competitions brilliantly – one I saw was a sweepstake to win a year’s supply of burritos for yourself and four friends every time you go to a restaurant – that’s great word of mouth marketing to me that uses Facebook brilliantly. Finally, without their Facebook posting, I would have never seen this beast of a burrito being made. I’m a massive Mexican food fan, and it’s a great video:

Ranking Signals… Social Signals… People Signals

A couple of blogs ago I made the point that Facebook Like probably does count as a ranking factor on Google. I can’t see why it wouldn’t be – since the USP of the Google natural search algorithm is quality, it would be pretty dumb not to count Facebook Like. The SEO industry is rather more interested in measuring whether Twitter is a ranking factor (indeed, SEOMoz had pretty conclusive data that it was before analysis of Facebook). Of course, we also have our new kid on the block Google + and the somewhat strange looking plus button (don’t you think it looks like LEGO block?). Now that one really must count as a ranking factor – I don’t really think I need any analysis to say that.

What’s the Most Important?

So now we have a logical belief that all of these social buttons have an influence on Google rankings. Now let’s assess which is the most important. But wait, here’s that toilet again:

Toilet Talks Social Media

The notion is nonsense. Facebook Like, the Tweet button and Google + all do different things. We shouldn’t worry about them as ranking signals. What we should be thinking is if a user of Twitter came to my page, would they tweet this? But then, what is a user of Twitter? Where is the context?

We must consider the likelihood of our audiences to be active on the social networkins when we offer the options of buttons. It could be thought that it’s better to have all the options available – but I disagree. Sometimes I look at the options a site provides and think – who the hell would use that?

Not entirely convinced a Netvibes button was ever worth it

If we have a site that’s heavily used by single males from North America, who work in technology and are aged 25-45, then it’s time to get your Google + button out. For Twitter, consider if your content fits a news agenda and has the latent currency necessary to be ReTweeted – the Tweet button makes sense. For Facebook Like, consider that a lot of people don’t share stuff that’s slightly nerdy or related to their job on Facebook – for fear of looking like a complete dork in front of their friends. On Twitter, their crowd will almost certainly be different and often aligned to their job. There are different people using different networks, and they use them in different ways because of the people they are connected with.

People Signals

In SEO, I’d like to see our obsession with ‘ranking signals’ die off. Social buttons probably do influence rankings, but the notion of pursuing social shares for this end makes no sense. Let’s have a little example:

On Tuesday Lily Allen (or Lily Cooper as she now prefers) opens up her shop in Covent Garden. Grazia go down there and check it out, then write a post about it. Lily Tweets this post to 3,000,000 followers – boom – there’s the traffic! It’s not going to come from ranking high ‘lily allen shop’ or ‘lucy in the skies’ – people won’t be looking for your content anyway – they’ll probably be looking for the shop website.

What Grazia did is write a piece that appeals to a particular person and that person has shared it. That she Tweeted the post is not a ranking signal, or a social signal – it’s a person signal. When more than one person shares it, it’s a people signal. The more influential people share it, the more people you’ll get to your site. I doubt they’ll come through a search engine.

A #winning 12 Stage Hustle Process for Link Building

Hustle is so important in social/search that I’ve decided to dedicate an entire category to it. What I want to give you is an actionable process of hustle and how to use it. It’s all very well saying, ‘You gotta have hustle’ and ‘I’ve got hustle’ but if you don’t know how to apply your hustler instincts to any process, you’ll be hustling in all the wrong places, doing loads of hustling and getting nowhere.

Here’s a hustle process that I went through with excellent results. I was working for a fairly large brand, but with just me doing the process, I managed about 1,000 manually built links (which I specified the exact location and HTML of) across about 50 sites over the course of three months. I even got my brand ranking number one in the world for ‘kama sutra’ in the process (200k visits a month). Unbelievable tekkers/good hustle.

Early Bird

#1) I researched my targets

I got into work when no one was there so I wouldn’t get bothered. I started going through a few sites that I’d noticed had some of our videos and images embedded but no links (having good content already certainly makes the process easier). I clicked through every relevant blogroll I could find. Within the two hours before everyone else got in I’d got 50 targets – easy.

#2) I wrote an email template

I went in with the approach that no one could give a monkey nut about placing my links from the off, so I never asked them in my first email. I normally said something along the lines of, “Hey (insert name), I like your site and was wondering if you’d be up for doing some exchanges such as pushing our content from your social profiles when it suits you, we’ll be happy to do the same.” (It was longer, but you get the point). No one can afford to write an entirely bespoke email all the time.

#3) I emailed everyone on my list personally

I often adapted the email template so it was more personal. If I could find out about the contact via their Twitter or LinkedIn bio, then I would put an aside to that in. If they supported Arsenal, I would tell them they’ll miss Cesc Fabregas. Sometimes I didn’t send email at all; I just tapped the people up on Facebook. In all the times I have used this technique, it has never failed to get a response. I once created a thirty strong student writing network out of doing this, but that’s another post.

A process aside – In my research sheet I had the following columns:

Name

Website URL

Email/Contact

Domain Authority

Status

The status column was critical. As soon as I messaged everyone I put their status as “Contacted – No Reply” and set the entire rows in orange. When someone replied and said they were up for it, I’d put them as “Partner” in green. No one said they weren’t interested, but if they happened to then I’d put them in “No interest” in Red. Sometimes they’d want a little more detail, so I’d put their status as “Partner – Unsure” in Blue. They always came round in the end. #winning

#4) I responded instantly to everyone who replied

I was at my desk the whole day (as a hustler needs to be), but getting all these replies so easily was so satisfying so I couldn’t help but respond. Of course some people didn’t reply straight away, but they were probably busy. I always asked if they had anything specific they wanted to push in my reply. Note: I still didn’t say that I wanted anything specific from them even though they usually had embeds of our content.

#5) I did something for everyone that replied before they could do anything for me

If the respondent said they had something specific to push, I pushed it. I got it published somewhere. Then I always emailed the relevant respondent to tell them where the link had been published. Almost everyone replied to say thanks.

A publishing aside – I didn’t have full publishing rights, and sometimes I had to deal with journalists who kept ‘forgetting’ to publish the links/videos for these partner sites or whatever. I would run downstairs and see these people personally and watch them do the simple task in two minutes. I didn’t email, I didn’t IM, I didn’t tweet them or Facebook chat them or even call them up. I went to them told them about it and watched them do it. In one case I actually did it for them while they made me tea. If they were at their desks, the job was always completed there and then. No waiting around for two weeks while someone screws about and does nothing that you want. #winning

Doing Nothing
Thanks to off the dribble.

#6) I messaged all the guys that were still orange

These were the people who still hadn’t replied, yet hadn’t said they weren’t interested. I did this after the weekend (I started on a Friday). There were probably about 20% of sites that hadn’t got back to me positively by this time. In the next two days I’d got this down to 10%.

Bad Customer #1 – On the second round I got some guy saying I would have to pay to get anything from him, to which I took him to the cleaners for infringing image copyright (pointing out the numerous URLs responsible) and insinuated that if he didn’t apply my reasonable future requests, then I’d inform Google and he’d lose his Adsense revenue. His tail was soon firmly between his legs and he said he’d do what we asked. When he said this I linked to his blog from all of our social media profiles. He got some traffic and he liked that. #winning

#7) I did their work.

After getting all these forty “Partners” I researched their sites more thoroughly and saw where our images and video were placed. I noted down all the URLs and then in the next column I wrote a sentence down which included two HTML links back to our site. In some cases there were near 50 pages of content where a partner had been using our stuff without permission.

A copyright aside – Your images are being used all over the web – are you really going to try and have them removed? Forget it. Too few people care about image rights or even the threat of prosecution – DMCA requests from the off are completely ridiculous (unless the site is clearly making money out of your content only) – what’s in it for you? This person could have been using your stuff for years and if you get them to take it down it will do nothing for you. Don’t get them to take it down, get them to put links in it – you’ll go shooting up a search engine. #winning.

#8) I requested they link us back

Finally I said I noticed they had some stuff on their site that I’d like them to attribute (the 8th step in the process!) and sent them a note with the spreadsheet I’d built in the last step. If there was a ton of links for them to do, I said I’d ensure I sent them a load of traffic and links in exchange so the tedious manual work would be worth their while. This is when it really pays to have a strong social media presence, because you can pay people to do the dog work in in a couple of Tweets/Status Updates. A lot of people didn’t do it straight away, so I hustled them. Some people said they did it all, but when I checked, some of the links were missing, so I hustled them. Some times they wouldn’t respond so I sent them a ton of traffic and let them know about it – then they responded. All of them did what I requested – not one sheet got wasted.

Bad Customer #2 – One guy really didn’t like it. He said his boss had told him no because, ‘Every time we link back we lose traffic.’ I explained that most of the articles where I wanted links were old and would get no visits anyway. He didn’t relent. I guaranteed he wouldn’t lose traffic because I’d send him a ton through a link dump. He didn’t relent. I asked again. He didn’t relent. I sent him a long email explaining my situation and that he was infringing copyright by using our material without my permission and that my request was entirely reasonable – I could use lawyers if I wanted to, but I wouldn’t (insinuating threats as a last resort can certainly work), and I requested I speak to his boss on the phone directly. It went on for ages – six weeks of backward and forwards – I would send emails to him when I was in the pub and my companion was at the bar. I just wanted those fricking links and the more time I spent, the more worthwhile it got. Eventually, one day when I went to work, all the links were up. I sent him as much traffic as I possibly could and said, ‘If you ever send that much traffic to me through these links, I’ll send you a video of myself eating a tri-cornered hat.’ I couldn’t care less about how much US traffic he could send me anyway, I was after the UK search visits. #winning.

#9) I created relationships

I would regularly email people seemingly out of the blue and ask them if they wanted anything specific. If they ever said yes I’d get what they wanted posted. By this point I’d hunted most of them down on Facebook and befriended them all. A couple of birthday’s came up – I sent them an email that just said: ‘Happy Birthday (NAME)’ and nothing else. They both replied instantly and asked if I wanted to push anything. On both occassions I thanked them but I didn’t have anything. Check out Keith Ferazzi’s Never Eat Alone – he is a daddy networker and his section on birthday calling should be required reading.

#10) I used relationships for further gain

Now two months were down the line and there were still some orange guys on my sheet – the ones that hadn’t replied. They wouldn’t get away from this. I messaged one of my partners who I saw clearly had a relationship with these orange guys and asked if he could provide me with additional contact details. He did. He also provided me with the direct contact details of two major publishing players in my vertical which I would have never been able to obtain anywhere else. I messaged all of them, changed another round of orange into green and had the two most important sites in the vertical on my sheet, also in green. These guys were so big one link could send us 40,000 visits in a day.

#11) I maintained a distribution network

By now I’d done so much for these all of these guys that they’d almost do anything I asked. I kept it reasonable and every video or press photo pack we created (about one a month) I sent them it and embedded a link to further relevant content in the HTML (it seemed so obvious, but this post came along if you need further assistance). I told them to let me know if they posted it and I’d ensure we’d return the favour. I always did. They always did what I asked.

#12) I recorded everything

All this hustle was great but unless you keep your spreadsheets tight you’re going to lose track of what you’re doing pretty quickly and make mistakes. I made sure all links were recorded in a sheet and status updates/links built the other way were also recorded. When I had this I could report back to my business the value I was creating, and also know which partners were actually doing stuff in return for my rewards. I was pretty happy with most of them.


Thanks to Michelle Barsi on Flickr

Tried and Tested YouTube Viral Formula #1

I’ve been doing a touch of YouTube research over the last week + weekend for my Friday sin of not doing enough. Primarily I wanted to find out a formula for virals. I watched a presentation by Cairin Norris about two years ago at SMX London and it fascinated me – what was the secret ingredient behind virality? What made virals so sharable?

Cairin said that virals were basically ‘cool shit that people like to share’ and the biggest viral of all time was YouTube itself – due to the addition of the embed feature which allowed wider sharing. In addition, he outlined five ‘Types of Viral’ (slide 15):

  • Ones that are funny
  • Ones that are unbelievable
  • Ones that pose a question
  • Ones that are informative
  • Ones that piggyback

And he finished it off by saying, ‘it’s the creative stupid.’ But what needed to be in the creative? If there can be a technique for producing creative ideas (which I have full faith works), then there must also be a technique for producing viral content, since this relied on creative.  There was something that needed closer inspection.

Top 50 Videos of All Time

I started my search for the formula at Time Magazine’s ‘Top 50 YouTube Videos of all Time.’ I looked down the list and found four things that linked most of them together:

  • Low production values
  • Cute
  • Funny
  • Extraordinary

The final point was the clincher. What makes a video of such low production values so sharable? It’s that it pitches the everyday/mundane vs. the extraordinary. Most of the videos on the list can follow this mantra:

An extraordinary resolution to a mundane event

People can relate to mundane events; from washing up to buying a takeaway meal, most of life is full of them. When you make them extraordinary they become something that people need to talk about. Anecdotes are much the same as online videos in this context. I always tell people about the extraordinary stuff within the everyday and mundane.

The Man, The Meeting and The Coffee Cup

Upon believing this formula, I thought it would be worth testing its application against any event. I messaged a friend on web chat and told him to name a mundane event. He said, ‘Drinking a cup of coffee.’ All we need is an extraordinary resolution.

Consider the following script:

  1. Man walks into Starbucks.
  2. Man buys coffee.
  3. Man walks back to the office holding but not drinking coffee.
  4. Man arrives at meeting, says hello to his co-workers and sits down at a meeting.
  5. Man takes off coffee lid and drinks coffee.

This is all terribly mundane. It’s something thousands of people across London do every day. But behold – the extraordinary resolution! Replace the final line with:

“Man takes off coffee lid and a rat leaps out and scuttles across the table in the direction of the female Managing Director, who screams and pushes her table over so the rat can’t get to her. Everyone in the room is hysterical.”

Now you are unlikely to have seen that coming. But it’s the kind of extraordinary resolution that would get people talking. How did the rat get in there? Did you see her face? Was it the disgruntled Starbucks employee who placed the rat? You would probably remember that for the rest of your life. You’d probably share it too.

rat

Of course, this isn’t the only formula for online video. Gary Vaynerchuck didn’t get where he is by following it – he follows another formula which I’ll go onto in my next post in this category. To leave you with the extraordinary resolution to a mundane event, I give you one of my favourite examples:

LOL – he fell off his chair! HA HA!