Archive for RoI

Ten Steps to Prove ROI on Social Media Spend vs. Traditional Media Spend

You don’t have to go far to find an article that talks about the RoI of social media (normally arguing the case for it). Anything regarding business change needs some sort of business case, which is fairly exhausting, and people have often found it daunting to prove the RoI of social media – myself included, although I have managed it to secure quite a lot of funding (it took pretty much three months though – what’s the RoI on that?).  There was a great article on UnMarketing a couple of weeks back that points out there’s a whole load of traditional business practices where we don’t need to prove RoI when perhaps we should.

Then, I think it was somewhere around the last couple of mornings while I was in the shower, it struck me. I think I saw a flash of something, but that could be the development of epilepsy. There is a seriously easy way to think of the RoI of social media marketing against traditional media.

Step One: Work out Your Media Spend

Get onto the marketing department (you may already be in it) and find out what the budget is for media spend. That shouldn’t be too hard – you may even be able to rustle up some documents of last year’s spend.

Step Two: Work out Your Media Reach

You’ve got the total spend, now look at the reach of the media where the spend is. How much does it cost to reach this amount of people? You could work out what the cost of reaching each person individually, but it’s not strictly necessary.

Step Three: Consider Effectiveness of Campaigns

Often clueless marketers spend all their money on half arsed campaigns in traditional media that don’t really work. It doesn’t help when they’re marketing a product that sucks. Delve into anything you can find where there was an apparent sales uplift as a consequence of media spend. If there is an uplift, then match that against spend and see if the campaign delivered RoI? If there’s no uplift, you’ll have a stronger business case for going social.

Step Four: Quantify Social Reach Costs

Now you’ll need to quantify the amount of money (think people) it would take to build the kind of social media footprint that would near or surpass the reach of your traditional media.  Say your traditional media reaches 80,000 people a week for a month at a cost of £40,000. Consider how much it would take to gain 80,000 social connections. If it would cost significantly more to achieve your social numbers, you’re going to struggle with your case.

Step Five: Consider Timing

You’ll also need to explain how long it will take to achieve the numbers. If you think it’s going to take five years, you should drop the case.

Step Six: Consider Engagement

There’s a slight issue with the last step around engagement. It’s difficult to quantify engagement rates, but if you can find anything out about it, consider the data. The bottom line is these are different types of media – lots of people ignore adverts in magazines and can’t remember them, but lots of people ignore messages within social media too.

Step Seven: Consider Permanency

Perhaps a better and easier case for social media than considering engagement is that once people are connected to your brand, they’re not all that likely to leave in the short term. That means you have a semi-permanent influence over social media connections when all you have in the traditional space is influence for the length of the campaign. Thinking about social media in the context of a campaign isn’t too clever. It’s a permanent thing, and that’s why I think it has an advantage vs. traditional.

Step Eight: Business Case

So you know traditional media spend and ROI vs.  the cost and timeframes of building your own audience via social media. You need to demonstrate that you can lower the cost of media spend via social media (by building your own permanent audience) over a time period. You may want to make a case for extra money, but it may be worth asking for investment from the budget which fills the traditional media spend. You won’t get success by saying social should have all of that spend; first of all, companies are rarely this rash and radical and you’ll get laughed out, and secondly, you still want to reach some people in traditional media, even if you have a social footprint.

Step Nine: Presentation

Be as factual as possible. The more cold hard data you can present in terms of your bottom line, the higher the chance of your executives opening the purse strings for social. It’s an entirely logical process: if you can build a permanent community which has as large a reach as traditional media over a good time period for a lower sum of money than traditional spend, it seems highly likely you will gain some traction. Think of the value of reaching 19 million people. Now think that Skittles has that value every time it updates its Facebook page.

Step Ten: Execution

You’ve probably spent a considerable amount of time proving the business case for social media, now you have to execute this plan. It is easy to be excited initially, and then the interest to wane if things don’t necessarily go to plan. Don’t be disheartened, keep at it. Brand building and social media can take la lot of time.

Facebook Can Be Your Digital Strategy

I was at SMX London not so long ago when a panel (who were talking on Credit Where Credit Is Due – Demystifying Online Attribution) declared the movement for promoting Facebook pages via TV advertising was wrong. The reason: because on Facebook you can’t capture or control customer data. It was the first time at a conference I’ve had to point out to the panel that they were wrong. They disagreed wholeheartedly, but they were wrong. Here’s why.

Facebook Allows You to Capture Loads of Data

It’s a myth that you can’t capture data on Facebook. In fact, I’ve seen some of our brands have significantly more success capturing data on Facebook than on their own destination site.  The fact is if you can advertise that you are running a competition to all your fans via the newsfeed, and directly link them to a competition form on Facebook, you can capture a healthy amount of data. I don’t really understand where the panel got their interpretation that customer data couldn’t be acquired. Perhaps you’re not going to find out as much about website behaviour and certain actions in a buying cycle (although you could iFrame an entire shop database if you were savvy enough), but you can certainly capture data.

There are a number of platform providers which fulfill data acquisition requirements, or you could build your own data capturing HTML forms and iFrame them in. You can even get the form filled in through the Registration plugin!. Here are some of the platform providers:

  • Wildfire – in my opinion the best promotion builder.
  • Context Optional – up there with Wildfire for promotions, but I wasn’t blown away by much else.
  • Buddy Media – this is the best all round platform for publishers, particularly when they want to promote partners through advertising promotions.
  • Involver – robust, but you need to get your developers trained in SML – difficult unless you’re an agency.
  • Syncapse – haven’t tested them out, but they have some big clients.

Facebook vs. Destination sites

Facebook is Simpler

Now you’ve captured this data, what are you going to do with it? You could plug it into an email strategy, if you need one. It’s actually pretty clear that for some businesses without the necessary scale in their digital activities, that they could forego an email strategy for a social media strategy.

Take a burrito bar. They could do plenty with a Facebook page and Twitter profile, but building an email strategy to sell burritos? Vouchering could go down well on email, but you could easily do promotions on your social channels only.

Developing Your Own Site vs. Facebook

What’s the cost of running of running your website? Designers, development, editorial, SEO, anything else?

What’s the cost of redeveloping your site to accommodate a new strategy? Fancy .PHP development for £300 a day?

Why do companies like Toblerone or Pepperidge Farm bother having websites? As if people are going to say to themselves, “Gee, I wish I knew more about Milano cookies. I know! I’ll go to their site!” Just a thought.

Ethan Jarlewski, Douglas Coupland JPOD.

Now think of Facebook. Free page that anyone can build, create offers exclusive to fans and build a following. No email needed, everything in the newsfeed. Pay for apps if you need them. Acquire fans for as little as 7p through Sponsored Stories. It’s cheaper – and it can some times offer more RoI than the rest of the web.

What’s with the Destination?

And would a burrito bar need a destination website anyway? I don’t really think it does – not anymore. People selling food, drink, even movies, cars and computer games may want to stick to the networks. For the small business owner who has enough on their plate, then social media (with particular focus on mobile vouchering and word of mouth) is surely the way to go. I often dream of setting up my own restaurant – burritos appear to be a goldmine – but a destination site isn’t a necessity in that plan. Just have a Facebook as your destination, a Twitter to enhance your reach and word of mouth, and, if you want to distribute videos (recipes might be a good idea), then a YouTube is the pick for that. Why do you need this crap? On the other hand, I think Bacardi have got the right idea.

Destination Unknown

Micro Improvements and Problems with RoI

Check out some of this toilet talk:

Toilets talking Return on Investment

On all of these ‘answers’ (all of which are more complicated questions than the preceding question) the problem of RoI on a micro level reigns. RoI should only be used in the context of overarching strategy on the web, not micro additions like all of these questions. Of course, it is up to the business leader/strategist to come up with the strategy that would suggest improvements and a Return on Investment. However, all of the above questions enquire into improvements to product – which is difficult to quantify with regards to RoI. When you plug SEO and Social improvements to your website, there won’t always be any RoI initially at all.

For instance, how can the removal of .asp.net ViewState from a site be quantified in terms of RoI? It might get your site up a few positions on Google (maybe even Bing) for a few keywords – but there’s no guarantee. It will make your site faster to load and thus a better product.

The Problem with RoI Proof

The big issue here is that while your RoI requesting business may be risk free, it’s always going to be a huge problem in your developments; a lot of web development needs to be tested before RoI can actually be quantified. If you are constrained by the kind of chatter above, it’s going to be a massive use of resources to actually just prove a business case. Perhaps it would be more costly to do all the necessary research (normally the data for which transcends several departments) than not do the proposal because the RoI can’t be worked out, than to just do the thing anyway, get on with it and work out the RoI afterwards. Even if it does screw up, you’ll always have some data for next time, so you’ll always get something out of it.